September 23, 2016

Holy Guacamole – Ted Cruz Endorsed Donald Trump!!!


This election is unlike any other in our nation’s history. Like many other voters, I have struggled to determine the right course of action in this general election.
In Cleveland, I urged voters, “please, don’t stay home in November. Stand, and speak, and vote your conscience, vote for candidates up and down the ticket whom you trust to defend our freedom and to be faithful to the Constitution.”
After many months of careful consideration, of prayer and searching my own conscience, I have decided that on Election Day, I will vote for the Republican nominee, Donald Trump.
I’ve made this decision for two reasons. First, last year, I promised to support the Republican nominee. And I intend to keep my word.
Second, even though I have had areas of significant disagreement with our nominee, by any measure Hillary Clinton is wholly unacceptable — that’s why I have always been #NeverHillary.
Six key policy differences inform my decision. First, and most important, the Supreme Court. For anyone concerned about the Bill of Rights — free speech, religious liberty, the Second Amendment — the Court hangs in the balance. I have spent my professional career fighting before the Court to defend the Constitution. We are only one justice away from losing our most basic rights, and the next president will appoint as many as four new justices. We know, without a doubt, that every Clinton appointee would be a left-wing ideologue. Trump, in contrast, has promised to appoint justices “in the mold of Scalia.”
For some time, I have been seeking greater specificity on this issue, and today the Trump campaign provided that, releasing a very strong list of potential Supreme Court nominees — including Sen. Mike Lee, who would make an extraordinary justice — and making an explicit commitment to nominate only from that list. This commitment matters, and it provides a serious reason for voters to choose to support Trump.
Second, Obamacare. The failed healthcare law is hurting millions of Americans. If Republicans hold Congress, leadership has committed to passing legislation repealing Obamacare. Clinton, we know beyond a shadow of doubt, would veto that legislation. Trump has said he would sign it.
Third, energy. Clinton would continue the Obama administration’s war on coal and relentless efforts to crush the oil and gas industry. Trump has said he will reduce regulations and allow the blossoming American energy renaissance to create millions of new high-paying jobs.
Fourth, immigration. Clinton would continue and even expand President Obama’s lawless executive amnesty. Trump has promised that he would revoke those illegal executive orders.
Fifth, national security. Clinton would continue the Obama administration’s willful blindness to radical Islamic terrorism. She would continue importing Middle Eastern refugees whom the FBI cannot vet to make sure they are not terrorists. Trump has promised to stop the deluge of unvetted refugees.
Sixth, Internet freedom. Clinton supports Obama’s plan to hand over control of the Internet to an international community of stakeholders, including Russia, China, and Iran. Just this week, Trump came out strongly against that plan, and in support of free speech online.
These are six vital issues where the candidates’ positions present a clear choice for the American people.
If Clinton wins, we know — with 100% certainty — that she would deliver on her left-wing promises, with devastating results for our country.
My conscience tells me I must do whatever I can to stop that.
We also have seen, over the past few weeks and months, a Trump campaign focusing more and more on freedom — including emphasizing school choice and the power of economic growth to lift African-Americans and Hispanics to prosperity.
Finally, after eight years of a lawless Obama administration, targeting and persecuting those disfavored by the administration, fidelity to the rule of law has never been more important.
The Supreme Court will be critical in preserving the rule of law. And, if the next administration fails to honor the Constitution and Bill of Rights, then I hope that Republicans and Democrats will stand united in protecting our fundamental liberties.
Our country is in crisis. Hillary Clinton is manifestly unfit to be president, and her policies would harm millions of Americans. And Donald Trump is the only thing standing in her way.
A year ago, I pledged to endorse the Republican nominee, and I am honoring that commitment. And if you don’t want to see a Hillary Clinton presidency, I encourage you to vote for him.

Hat Tip: Ted Cruz's Facebook Post

The difference between a Protest and a Riot



September 17, 2016

Illegal Immigrants Committing Crimes



Do you think all illegal immigrants who are ever convicted of a crime should be immediately deported?

Yes! Yes, they should be immediately deported! Illegal immigrants are not supposed to be in the country in the first place. If you’re an illegal immigrant and you’re in the United States of America, you’re breaking the law!

I was reading a report over on The Daily Caller this morning about how a “twice-arrested illegal immigrant” killed a Kansas Sheriff’s Deputy last Sunday.

“Adrian Espinosa-Flores, 38, was charged Monday with involuntary manslaughter and he allegedly was driving drunk and crashed his pickup truck into the patrol car stopped on the side of the road. The crash killed Johnson County (Kansas) Sheriff’s Department Master Deputy Brandon Collins, 45.”

Stories like this one are happening all across the United States of America, but for some reason politicians are using these stories to divide us. We should be united in agreement over what should happen with illegal immigrants.

Why do illegal immigrants get special treatment in this country?

We as a nation seem to be doing everything backwards! We reward criminals and punish the innocent – why is that? Why do we call good evil, and evil good?

Adrian Espinosa-Flores should have never come to the United States illegally in the first place.

The illegal immigration chaos is never ending!

The article goes on to say that “Espinosa-Flores was previously arrested for DUI in California in 2001 and a traffic violation in Kansas in 2013. ICE has said they were not notified of either of those arrests.”

You want to know why ICE wasn’t notified? ICE wasn’t notified because the Kansas City Police Department that arrested Espinosa-Flores said, “it could be considered profiling because of a lot of people of all races are arrested without a proper ID.”

Come again!??

ICE is blaming the police department for not notifying them and the police department is blaming their lack of communication on perceived profiling?

Uh, do your job people!!!

If someone breaks the law, do your job! Please follow proper protocol! Who cares if people think you are profiling! It doesn’t matter what they think, do your job! It’s what you got hired to do in the first place. Why did you become a police officer?

I know you didn’t become a police officer worried about what criminals think. We already know what they think, they are criminals. If a criminal breaks the law or commits a crime they will be arrested.

ICE should be supporting our police officers instead of chastising them or accusing them of racial profiling.

As for illegal immigrants – they are here in this country ILLEGALLY. They are NOT law-abiding citizens. And if the police catch them committing further criminal activity – YES, they ought to be deported immediately!

Normally I would link to the Daily Caller so you guys can find the article yourselves but unfortunately they decided to display an ad of Kim Kardashian and her nude photos. So….No thanks! Besides…I’m pretty sure if you search it out you can find the article for yourselves.

September 2, 2016

Clinton Cash – Pay to Play – What is it and what does it mean?

 clinton cash countries and donation amounts

Clinton Cash goes into great detail to reveal many of the political and financial connections that allowed Bill and Hillary Clinton to go from being ‘dead broke’ after leaving the White House, to amassing a net worth of over $150 million, with $2 billion in donations to their foundation. This wealth was accumulated during the time that Mrs. Clinton’s  was Secretary of State. The entire fortune was accumulated through lucrative speaking fees and contracts paid for by foreign companies and Clinton Foundation donors.

One of the most revealing examples is Ericsson, a telecom giant that had come under heavy fire for selling telecom equipment to countries that were considered state sponsors of terrorism by Hillary’s State Department. 
 
The company received a letter in late 2010 from the Securities and Exchange Commission, warning it about the sells to oppressive governments. U.S. diplomatic cables noted that State Department officials had “regularly and increasingly” raised Ericsson’s transgressions with the Swedish foreign minister.
 
In June 2011, the State Department began drafting a list of specific goods and services that should be covered under expanded sanctions that were to be imposed on Iran and other state sponsors of terrorism.
 
Meanwhile, Ericsson decided to pay Bill Clinton more money than he had ever been paid for a single speech: $750,000. In the previous decade, Ericsson had never sponsored a speaking engagement for either Hillary or Bill Clinton.

During his November 12, 2011 speech at a telecom conference in Hong Kong, Bill Clinton spoke in general terms about the positive role telecom plays in our lives. One week later, on November 19, the State Department unveiled its new sanctions list for Iran. Telecom was not on the list.
 
Seven DAYS after Bill Clinton received payment, Hillary Clinton’s State Department issued a statement that said “we’re going to ask the company to police themselves.

In April 2012, President Obama signed an executive order imposing sanctions on telecom sales to Iran and Syria. But those sanctions did not cover Ericsson’s work in Iran.
 
I encourage anyone and everyone, regardless of what side of the political fence you are on to WATCH this film. You will clearly see just how much money plays into the decision making of career politicians and just how corrupt and damaging to ALL people, the establishment of D.C. is and how financially motivated they are in all the decision making.

Another disturbing “coincidence” is when former President Bill Clinton “appears” to have played a role in helping mining magnate Frank Giustra enter into a lucrative uranium mining deal with Kazakhstan. That deal coincided with generous donations to the Clinton Foundation.

From the back cover of the book:
Most people assume that the Clintons amassed their considerable wealth through lucrative book deals and speaking gigs that sometimes paid as much as $500,000–$750,000. But who paid these fees, and why? Often foreign businessmen and governments made the enormous payments, believing the Clintons would help advance their interests.

As Peter Schweizer reveals, the Clintons typically blur the lines between politics, philanthropy, and business. Consider the following: Bill flies into a third world country, where he spends time in the company of a businessman described as a “close personal friend.” Introductions are made. A deal is struck—usually to exploit natural resources, such as uranium, oil, or timber, on a large and highly profitable scale. Soon after that, enormous contributions are made to the Clinton Foundation from those who benefited from the deal, while Bill is commissioned to deliver a series of highly paid speeches. Moreover, some of these deals require approval or review by the US government and fall within the purview of a powerful senator and secretary of state.

This scenario plays out again and again—in Kazakhstan, Colombia, and other places at the “Wild West” fringe of the global economy. Often the people involved are characters of a kind that an American ex-president (not to mention the spouse of a sitting senator, secretary of state, or presidential candidate) should have nothing to do with.

In this blockbuster exposé, Schweizer reveals
  • the mysterious multimillion-dollar Foundation gift from an obscure Indian politician that coincided with Senator Clinton’s reversal on the nuclear non-proliferation treaty;
  • how Secretary of State Clinton was involved in allowing the transfer of nearly 50 percent of US domestic uranium output to the Russian government, benefiting large donors to the Clinton Foundation;
  • how multimillion-dollar contracts for Haiti disaster relief were awarded to donors and friends of Hillary and Bill;
  • how Bill received large payments for speeches from foreign businesses and governments with matters pending before the State Department;
  • how the Clintons’ joint visit to Colombia was followed by the grant of lucrative logging rights to a Canadian billionaire, a top Clinton Foundation donor;
  • how Bill received $2 million for speeches from the largest shareholder in the Keystone Pipeline project, even as Hillary played a role in approving it.
Meticulously researched and scrupulously sourced, Clinton Cash raises serious and alarming questions of judgment, of possible indebtedness to an array of foreign interests, and, ultimately, of fitness for high public office.

Watch Clinton Cash here
Buy the Book here
 
Gayla – Follow me @Gayla
This article originally appeared on Not Before Coffee

September 1, 2016

Hillary Clinton The Bought and Paid For Candidate – Introducing Her Biggest Donors

CNN really is the Clinton News Network — While digging around on OpenSecrets I pulled up the Hillary Clinton career donor list. Look who is #8 on that list. If anyone REALLY thinks they’ll get real, true and fair news there — well, I hate to burst your bubble! In case you didn’t know, Time Warner consists of three divisions; Home Box Office Inc. (HBO), Turner Broadcasting System, Inc., and Warner Bros.

Here’s the screenshot. Good Ol’ Time Warner right there! So it stands to reason, with the sizeable investments they have made in Hillary Clinton, they naturally want her to win. But, the list gets even better… keep reading below.

Hillary Clinton OpenSecrets Career Contributions List 

Since the primaries ended, it’s become more than obvious to me that CNN stood in strong support of Donald Trump early on because they wanted him to get the nomination thinking he was the one Hillary could actually beat.

Once I began digging into the funding and sponsorships of Hillary, I kept digging deeper
into the contributions she has received during this 2016 election cycle.

Here is a list of her donors, the dollar amounts she has received followed by information on who those donors are and how much they have contributed to the elites of Washington DC.


Gayla – follow me @Gayla

August 31, 2016

Chris Quinn Accuses Donald Trump and Marco Rubio of Attending Anti-Gay Event in Florida

Chris Quinn shouts at Kayleigh Mcenany
Last night while watching the Clinton News Network, Hillary Clinton supporter Christine Quinn and Donald Trump supporter Kayleigh McEnany erupted on CNN over the Orlando shooter’s father sitting prominently behind Clinton at her Florida rally this week. McEnany said that “we cannot control how third parties support us,” but made the case that Mateen is with Clinton because of her “weak” policies on ISIS.

McEnany had a massive grin for most of the segment, probably because she was getting to go after Clinton instead of having to excuse Trump’s latest screw-up. She called it “unfathomable” that Seddique Mateen may have been put there by the campaign.

Quinn EXPLODED and said "they" fully disavowed him, calling her insinuations “beyond offensive.” When McEnany tried to jump in, Quinn shouted, “Wait a minute, no!… You can’t ask me a question!”

MY COMMENT: I've searched HIGH and LOW for PROOF that Hillary Clinton disavowed Seddique Mateen and find NOTHING. All I have been able to find is that Spokesman, Nick Merrill has said "Hillary Clinton disagrees with Seddique Mateen's "views and disavows his support."

However, unlike the calls and attacks against Donald Trump for not publically and verbally disavowing David Duke of the KKK, Hillary Clinton has not and the Hillary Campaign has done nothing more than play down the appearance of Saddique Mateen at her Kissimmee rally earlier this week. 

Quinn goes on to list her ABC's in defense of Hillary Clinton. On her list, ITEM C is the one that caught my attention most. "C - Donald Trump is GOING tomorrow, WITH Marc Rubio, IN Florida, NOT far from the Pulse nightclub, where 49 LGBT people were massacred to an anti-gay organization event. So DO NOT try to equate the mistake the was made by her campaign staff, and I agree with Tara, that whoever was in charge of crowds last night should LOSE THEIR JOB." 
 
McEnany responded, "Can I ask you a question?"

Quinn, still shouting, "and wait a minute, wait a minute, NO YOU CAN'T ASK ME A QUESTION!"

McEnany said, “‘Cause you can’t answer the question!”

Quinn shot back, “Oh, you can’t ask me a question, honey, I can’t answer!”

The question was "What attracted the father of the Orlando terrorist to you candidate?"
 
Quinn went on with some mumbo-jumbo about the man being mentally ill.

Watch the exchange on YouTube here
 
Now, back to Quinn's point C! I couldn't stop thinking about her statement about Donald Trump attending an event with an anti-gay organization. So, as usual, I had to find the TRUTH!

Once I found the TRUTH, I just sat and shook my head, like I do often these days at every bit of shit the Clinton campaign or her supporters throw at Donald Trump.

Here's the TRUTH!
 
The Wall Street Journal reports Donald Trump is scheduled on Thursday to attend a private gathering of PASTORS in Orlando with Marco Rubio. This event is hosted by the America Renewal Project, which describes itself as “people of faith affecting public policy.” When I clicked through the link they had described as “propagates anti-gay bias” to see just WHY and HOW this organization got the label of being anti-gay, this is what I saw! Screenshot below or you can click the image to see the page for yourself.

donald trump marco rubio attend anti gay event in florida

How in the name of ALL that is Holy they can twist that so ridiculously to make it an anti-gay thing, is beyond me. It is a luncheon for PASTORS and their SPOUSES.
 
Again, believe half what you see and none of what you hear.

Chris Quinn is a loud-mouthed buffoon! She HARDLY has any room to point the finger at anyone and call them bully to any degree!

Gayla – follow me @Gayla
This article originally appeared on Not Before Coffee



















August 30, 2016

Hillary Clinton Keeps Score and Returns Favors – Tim Kaine Exhibit A

 Hillary Clinton and Tim Kaine - 8 years in the making

When Hillary ran her presidential campaign back in 2008, the campaign co-chair was Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

Let’s say, hypothetically, that after losing to Obama, Hillary Clinton wanted to ensure her own nomination in 2016. What better way to lock it down than by having her campaign co-chair lead the Democratic party?

In order to make this happen, Hillary would have to compel the current chair to step down AND for him to recommend Debbie Wasserman Schultz assume the position and lead the Democratic party as the chair.

How could she possibly influence a person enough to make them step down from such a high-paid position and without a plan for income to support their family? A decision that would result in a two-year sabbatical from politics before being elected back into office of some sort.

Naturally there would have to be a very enticing offer for someone to make a decision of that magnitude. Right?

In 2011, the chairman of the DNC did just that! Tim Kaine stepped down, recommended Debbie Wasserman Schultz for the position, and disappeared for nearly 2-years from the political scene.

What could have possibly been in this for him?

Tim Kaine being selected as the Vice Presidential Nominee is not a coincidence folks. It’s all a part of Hillary Clinton’s political game! She is absolutely the BIGGEST “pay-for-play” candidate we have ever known!

Fast Forward to July 2016:
 
Just as the Democratic National Convention was about to get underway, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, chairwoman of the DNC, abruptly resigned after a trove of leaked emails showed party officials conspiring to sabotage the campaign of Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont.
Later that very day, the Clinton Campaign released this statement:

“I want to thank my longtime friend Debbie Wasserman Schultz for her leadership of the Democratic National Committee over the past five years. I am grateful to Debbie for getting the Democratic Party to this year’s historic convention in Philadelphia, and I know that this week’s events will be a success thanks to her hard work and leadership. There’s simply no one better at taking the fight to the Republicans than Debbie–which is why I am glad that she has agreed to serve as honorary chair of my campaign’s 50-state program to gain ground and elect Democrats in every part of the country, and will continue to serve as a surrogate for my campaign nationally, in Florida, and in other key states. I look forward to campaigning with Debbie in Florida and helping her in her re-election bid–because as President, I will need fighters like Debbie in Congress who are ready on day one to get to work for the American people.”
Obviously Little Debbie had done her job well and even though she was caught red-handed rigging the election – Hillary had kept score and was repaying the favor placing Debbie right back in the same position she held back in 2008.

How can anyone NOT see what’s going on? HOW?

Gayla – follow me @Gayla
This article originally appeared on Not Before Coffee

Hillary Clinton Keeps Score and Returns Favors – Tim Kaine Exhibit A

 Hillary Clinton and Tim Kaine - 8 years in the making

When Hillary ran her presidential campaign back in 2008, the campaign co-chair was Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

Let’s say, hypothetically, that after losing to Obama, Hillary Clinton wanted to ensure her own nomination in 2016. What better way to lock it down than by having her campaign co-chair lead the Democratic party?

In order to make this happen, Hillary would have to compel the current chair to step down AND for him to recommend Debbie Wasserman Schultz assume the position and lead the Democratic party as the chair.

How could she possibly influence a person enough to make them step down from such a high-paid position and without a plan for income to support their family? A decision that would result in a two-year sabbatical from politics before being elected back into office of some sort.

Naturally there would have to be a very enticing offer for someone to make a decision of that magnitude. Right?

In 2011, the chairman of the DNC did just that! Tim Kaine stepped down, recommended Debbie Wasserman Schultz for the position, and disappeared for nearly 2-years from the political scene.

What could have possibly been in this for him?

Tim Kaine being selected as the Vice Presidential Nominee is not a coincidence folks. It’s all a part of Hillary Clinton’s political game! She is absolutely the BIGGEST “pay-for-play” candidate we have ever known!

Fast Forward to July 2016:
 
Just as the Democratic National Convention was about to get underway, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, chairwoman of the DNC, abruptly resigned after a trove of leaked emails showed party officials conspiring to sabotage the campaign of Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont.
Later that very day, the Clinton Campaign released this statement:

“I want to thank my longtime friend Debbie Wasserman Schultz for her leadership of the Democratic National Committee over the past five years. I am grateful to Debbie for getting the Democratic Party to this year’s historic convention in Philadelphia, and I know that this week’s events will be a success thanks to her hard work and leadership. There’s simply no one better at taking the fight to the Republicans than Debbie–which is why I am glad that she has agreed to serve as honorary chair of my campaign’s 50-state program to gain ground and elect Democrats in every part of the country, and will continue to serve as a surrogate for my campaign nationally, in Florida, and in other key states. I look forward to campaigning with Debbie in Florida and helping her in her re-election bid–because as President, I will need fighters like Debbie in Congress who are ready on day one to get to work for the American people.”
Obviously Little Debbie had done her job well and even though she was caught red-handed rigging the election – Hillary had kept score and was repaying the favor placing Debbie right back in the same position she held back in 2008.

How can anyone NOT see what’s going on? HOW?

Gayla – follow me @Gayla
This article originally appeared on Not Before Coffee

Donald Trump Mocked a Reporter with a Disability – Or Did He?

trump-vets
The media got it SO wrong, BUT do you know WHY they force-feed this story?

You’ll be very surprised! Even as much as I support Donald Trump, this is one of those stories that really bothered me. But, like everyone else, I was only getting a small bit of the whole story.
  
I’ll say it again, believe HALF what you see and NONE of what you hear – UNLESS you do extensive research and find the absolute, verifiable proof to support the claim. And, unless it comes from the DNC or Hillary, then of course, believe NOTHING!

Check this…Democrats and establishment GOP opponents of Donald Trump, over the past year, push the “MYTH” that Donald Trump MOCKED the disability of New York Times reporter, Serge Kovaleski.

Granted, this accusation has served them very well as a convenient tool to smear Trump’s character AND to avoid having to confront him on substantive political issues.

But is it true?

Without reinventing the wheel, I found this article on Catholics for Trump. Don’t let the name fool you, they have done an excellent job at providing links, images and VIDEO to support their research.

THIS is the story the media is not telling you along with a VERY clear explanation of WHY they are not telling you the truth! I urge you to take a few minutes to read this article, watch the video samples and click on their links. SEE the TRUTH with your OWN two eyes and hear it with your OWN two ears!

Gayla – follow me @Gayla
This article originally appeared on Not Before Coffee

August 29, 2016

Labor Unions Including the UAW Invest Millions of Member Dues in Hillary Clinton

 labor unions political contributions

Never more than this year. The Union Leadership will take member dues and spend them to support Democratic Candidates that the members don’t support. 40% of Union members vote Republican but 90% of Union money goes to Democrats. We support Unions and we support Union workers when done right. The problem is that Leftist Union Leadership has hijacked the Unions just like they have hijacked our government and other institutions. Many unions no longer represent the best interests of their members. They shake their members down for money to support other leftist who are destroying our nation.

Here is a list of Union donations and their rankings – 90% of which went to Democrat Candidates in 2014 and the trend continues. This list of unions top the Koch Brothers in political donations. Via Open Secrets:

2.) American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees $60,667,379
4.) National Education Assn $53,594,488
7.) Intl Brotherhood of Electrical Workers $44,478,789
8.) United Auto Workers $41,667,858
9.) Carpenters & Joiners Union $39,260,371
10.) Service Employees International Union $38,395,690
11.) Laborers Union $37,494,010
12.) American Federation of Teachers $36,713,325
13.) Communications Workers of America $36,188,135
14.) Teamsters Union $36,123,209
16.) United Food & Commercial Workers Union $33,756,550
20.) Machinists & Aerospace Workers Union $31,313,097
23.) AFL-CIO $30,938,977
32.) National Assn of Letter Carriers $26,106,359
39.) Plumbers & Pipefitters Union $23,886,248
42.) Operating Engineers Union $23,036,848
43.) International Assn of Fire Fighters $22,963,260
46.) Sheet Metal Workers Union $22,372,978
59.) Koch Industries $18,083,948

According to this Rasmussen Report of August 10, 2016, most voters – including those who are now or have been union members – believe the majority of union leaders are out of touch with their membership nationwide.

The Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that just 20% of Likely U.S. Voters think most organized labor leaders do a good job representing union members. Fifty-seven percent (57%) say most union leaders are out of touch with most of their members from throughout the nation. One-in-four (24%) are undecided.

To see the survey questions and wording of this national survey of 1,000 U.S. likely voters conducted August 3-4, 2016, click here.

Even among voters who are now or have been a member of a labor union, only 25% think union leaders do a good job representing their membership. Fifty-seven percent (57%) of these voters say most organized labor leaders are out of touch with their members. This is a concern to Democrats this election cycle with many union members reportedly leaning toward Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump because of his positions on jobs and free trade even though union leaders are solidly behind Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton.

Labor unions donated nearly a half-billion dollars to Democrats and left-wing causes from 2012 to 2014, according to this report. The $418 million identified in the report from Center for Union Facts is in addition to millions more spent in 2015 and this year by organized labor, long a reliable backer of Democrat and left-wing causes.

Do Your Own Research: 
 
The Center for Union Facts (CUF) has compiled the single most comprehensive database of information about labor unions in the United States. The database contains more than 100 million facts, ranging from basic union finances and leader salaries, to political operations, to strikes and unfair labor practices, and much more. The data comes from various local, state, and federal government agencies that track labor union operations.

hat tip
 
Gayla – Follow me @Gayla
This article originally appeared on Not Before Coffee

Here’s How Second Amendment People Can Deal with Hillary Clinton

This is just one more example of people hearing what the media TELLS them to hear. I watched it as it was happening and was SHOCKED to see people getting their panties in a wad. What I HEARD was the 2nd Amendment people - either voters or the NRA with all the massive amount of money they spend on lobbying, special interests and political contributions MIGHT be able to prevent her from getting to the place where she COULD appoint SCOTUS. Stop being so damn dramatic people!

Seriously, check out the dollar amounts and rankings on this screenshot from OpenSecrets.org National Rifle Association page and tell me you don’t think the “Second Amendment People” can do anything about her and helping her LOSE the election! NRA IN CASE YOU MISSED IT: Donald Trump set off a massive shit-storm earlier today with remarks about the right to bear arms that were surprisingly interpreted as a threat against Hillary Clinton. Here’s what he said…
"Hillary wants to abolish, essentially the Second Amendment. By the way, if she gets to pick, if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don't know. But I tell you what, that will be a horrible day, if Hillary gets to put her judges in, right now we're tied."
Trump's comments alarmed some overly-dramatic liberals as to whether he was threatening her life or calling for increased political activity. Watch for yourself here:
Imagine that! If you support your second amendment right – make sure you are registered to vote. Make sure you are registered properly and do your part!

Gayla – follow me @Gayla
This article originally appeared on Not Before Coffee